About 121 minutes
Body, Parentage and Character in History: Notes on the Tudor Period — Context and Discussion
Modern Nations
27,624 recorded words. 6 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #36993Heroes of the Great Conflict; Life and Services of William Farrar Smith, Major General, United States Volunteer in the Civil War — Themes and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 26,360 words, 1 hr 55 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 34.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Biography,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 121 minutes
Modern Nations
27,624 recorded words. 6 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #36993About 108 minutes
Modern Nations
24,775 recorded words. 7 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #48703About 107 minutes
Modern Nations
24,560 recorded words. 8 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #20616Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 94 public books, 94 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
James Harrison Wilson, himself a Union major general, wrote this sketch of William Farrar Smith shortly after Smith's death in 1903. The opening pages immediately establish a critical stance toward the official Rebellion Records, which Wilson calls "dry and unemotional" and silent on leaders' "qualities and idiosyncrasies." He argues that personal recollections supported by letters and diaries are essential for interpreting official reports. This framing sets up a biography that aims to supplement—and sometimes correct—the documentary record with insider knowledge.
The author explicitly positions his work as a corrective to the Rebellion Records, which he says "deal but slightly with men's motives" and give "rarely any adequate description of the topography of the theatre of war." He insists that contemporaneous journals and publications cannot be safely ignored, and that personal recollections—though often untrustworthy—are valuable when supported by letters and diaries. This methodological preface is unusual for a military biography of the period and suggests Wilson intends to weigh evidence rather than simply praise his subject.
Wilson also names Smith among "the most notable men of the day" and places him in a circle including Lee, McClellan, Joseph E. Johnston, and William B. Franklin. He notes that these officers were "widely regarded as the best educated and the most brilliant in the service," a claim that reflects the popular belief of the time but also signals the author's personal connections.
The longest excerpt describes Smith's role in planning the crossing of the Tennessee River before the Battle of Missionary Ridge. Wilson presents Smith's proposal in detail: Sherman's army was to cross at Brown's Ferry, move under cover of woods, re-cross the river by a bridge built at night, and land on the end of Missionary Ridge to roll up Bragg's army. Wilson includes a skeptical note from Assistant Secretary of War Dana, who initially thought the plan impractical, and then a dramatic moment when Sherman, after inspecting the site, closed his field glasses and said, "Baldy, it can be done!"
Wilson claims the crossing was executed without fault, but the battle did not unfold as planned. He asserts that the victory was won by Thomas's army, not Sherman's, and that for nearly twenty-five years Grant and Sherman believed—incorrectly—that Sherman's attack caused Bragg to weaken his center. Wilson states this has been "shown by irrefutable testimony" and that "not a single regiment" was withdrawn from Thomas's front. The passage is a pointed revision of the official narrative.
Wilson inserts himself into the narrative, noting that he "assisted in transferring the troops to the South bank of the river" using the steamer Dunbar, which had been placed under his command. This first-hand account lends weight to his version of events but also raises questions about objectivity—Wilson was a participant, not a detached historian. The biography thus functions as both a tribute to Smith and a defense of Wilson's own role in the campaign.
The excerpts do not reveal whether Wilson addresses Smith's later career or the controversies that surrounded him, such as his relief from command after the Battle of Fredericksburg. The focus on a single episode—the Missionary Ridge planning and execution—suggests the book may be more a vindication of Smith's strategic acumen than a full life story. Readers should note that the available text is incomplete and may omit significant portions of Smith's biography.
Wilson’s sketch is best read as a participant’s intervention in historical memory, not a neutral biography. The author’s explicit distrust of official records and his reliance on personal knowledge make this a valuable primary source for the Battle of Missionary Ridge, but one that requires cross-referencing with other accounts. Readers interested in Smith’s full career or in the controversies surrounding his service will need to consult additional works.
That rainy afternoon, I kept circling back to Smith’s quiet vindication against Grant’s bluster, his honor restored by a friend’s steady pen. Afterwards, an old map on my desk pulled me toward a different frontier, where outlaws ruled the Ohio’s wild bends. Their stories felt like secret histories too, and I found The Outlaws of Cave-in-Rock Historical Accounts of the Famous Highwaymen and River Pirates — A Reader’s Guide waiting like a lantern in the gloom.
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.